Imagine equality. How do you define it? The easiest way would be to think of equality as contentment, where everyone is at peace with no positive or negative forces acting on them. How desirable is that?
It feels good in theory that everyone is content; everyone is at peace; everyone has everything he or she wants.
Believe me, you wouldn't want everyone to achieve that state. Because it leads to inertia. There won't be any type of action - positive or negative. There would be a state of suspended animation: people alive but not able to do anything because they do not want anything.
Creation is based upon disbalance. I had a friend tell me that world would hv been pleasant if God was nice to everyone in general. Think about it.
Isn't tension necessary for action to take place? That action could be creation or it could be destruction of something. But there would be action.
In case of all prevalent contentment, there won't be any action. Nobody will want to break free. Nobody will want to bind himself to his love. Everyone would be sedated, stoned, doing nothing...not even dreaming. I am told such a time comes and it is called "pralay" or dismantling of all creation. Like the chess pieces after a game, everything is put into a box...until the next game starts.
I cannot vouch for the theory of "pralay". I haven't experienced it. But I know that tension is necessary for things to act - constructively or destructively. And out of destruction, comes many more constructions. Also, even as things are created, many related things are being destroyed.
In case you are perfecting your speech, your words become powerful but as your pitch increases, you are killing microbes just using your voice.
Do let me know if you have counter thoughts.
~
AK
http://powercutmedia.com
It feels good in theory that everyone is content; everyone is at peace; everyone has everything he or she wants.
Believe me, you wouldn't want everyone to achieve that state. Because it leads to inertia. There won't be any type of action - positive or negative. There would be a state of suspended animation: people alive but not able to do anything because they do not want anything.
Creation is based upon disbalance. I had a friend tell me that world would hv been pleasant if God was nice to everyone in general. Think about it.
Isn't tension necessary for action to take place? That action could be creation or it could be destruction of something. But there would be action.
In case of all prevalent contentment, there won't be any action. Nobody will want to break free. Nobody will want to bind himself to his love. Everyone would be sedated, stoned, doing nothing...not even dreaming. I am told such a time comes and it is called "pralay" or dismantling of all creation. Like the chess pieces after a game, everything is put into a box...until the next game starts.
I cannot vouch for the theory of "pralay". I haven't experienced it. But I know that tension is necessary for things to act - constructively or destructively. And out of destruction, comes many more constructions. Also, even as things are created, many related things are being destroyed.
In case you are perfecting your speech, your words become powerful but as your pitch increases, you are killing microbes just using your voice.
Do let me know if you have counter thoughts.
~
AK
http://powercutmedia.com
Comments
Post a Comment